BIG DAVE FROM THE TOP ROPE

BIG DAVE FROM THE TOP ROPE

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The troony that makes these threads should be beaten into a coma with a tire iron

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's Rovert trying to force another shitty meme

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Thanks for the update davetroony

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Gracias, el travestido David

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    more like the cope rope

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Chris L

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >japshit is dead
    >TV ratings are dead
    >No sources

    Look at Dave trying to salvage a career by trying to make his own moron score system the important part of his paywalled wrestleblog.

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Matches with those ratings won match of the year before Dave gave out 5+ star ratings every time Will Ospreay takes a shit.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Ospreay's the best wrestler of all time. He's right to give 'em out more often with how good the best guys are nowadays.

      I'm sorry the thing you liked when you were five got better in quality, you fricking sperg.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Ironic shitposting is still shitposting, you meme-loving ninny.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Ospreay's the best wrestler of all time
        lol at the fact that people actually believe this. no wonder why the business is dying.

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Now post the tweet were he basically says his margin of error is 0.75 stars so a 4.75 is actually a 5.5.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      you are a moron

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I just listened to Jim and Brian destroy Meltzer on CVV trying to defend his star system. Whole thing's a joke. Meltzer's a joke.

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >rating wrestling matches
    Wrestling matches aren't movies. Even movie ratings are a joke.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Nah, rating anything is fine if you provide an explanation of what criteria you're rating it based on. The only way to reasonably rate wrestling is either as chapters of ongoing stories, as full shows as an overall chapter of the larger company story or isolating the story arcs and rating them when they finish. No one does any of those things, they just count high spots and score accordingly.
      Rating films makes sense if you understand film. Most people who rate things online don't understand the things that they rate, but that doesn't mean that everyone is an idiot.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You a moron

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    He's talking about his random star numbers like they're universal truths again

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They're objective truths if he wants to praise a wrestler but when questioned on his reasoning for the ratings he'll say it's just his opinion.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        When questioned on their reasoning, e-drones talk about tickets sold

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You cut your dick off, troony

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            and trannies, sorry, they NEVER stop thinking about fricking trannies

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            This got the 'cord seething

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            this meme will never be over

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            nah u r

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Excuse me?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It's a better metric that one single demented israelite's biased opinion

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >It's my favorite movie because it was a blockbuster!
            >It's my favorite album because it's #1 this summer!
            >It's my favorite painting because it has the longest line to get in!

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You suck israeli dick online for free like a good paypiggy, lil bro

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >You suck israeli dick online
            That's actually you Mr. I Support The Most Popular Thing

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Ad populum may be shallow but ut's still better than one senile old moron's with bad taste's opinion.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yes, but the screenshot you posted is him saying they are objective truths, so that doesn't support your argument.
        If you do approach something objectively then your score will be objective but only if you know what you're talking about and only in the context that you review it in.
        But yeah, he doesn't even know what his own stars are based on and if two job guys did the exact same match, move for move, with the same build up as Ospreay Vs Danielson he wouldn't give it the same rating despite being the exact same. His ratings are based on mark bias, based on who is pushed hardest, how many moves they do, etc.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >muh moves strawman
          You're moronic, he's given NOAH matches with nothing but kicks and punches that nobody fricking saw 5 stars. He's also very up front about crowd heat influencing ratings

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Kicks and punches are moves you brain-dead moron.
            And he does go on and on about "crowd heat", but he also reports imaginary crowd heat, regularly explains that what he heard is some fantasy that never happened in real life or that actually the crowd was doing what he imagined they would do because a random stranger emailed him saying so, despite all evidence proving otherwise.
            So no, I won't count other marks chanting even though that's a completely arbitrary objection anyway.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >I won't count other marks chanting even though that's a completely arbitrary objection anyway.
            I agree his rating for Hulk-Rock was much too high

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I don't even know what sort of mentally ill logic you think you're making.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            he thinks he is being edgy

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >That shit sucked, 5 stars
        What the frick?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Dave thinks it makes him sound unbiased, but most people will think that he’s openly admitting to giving 5 stars just because he likes the people in the match.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Careful, the cult of meltzer has a big presence here since the aew discord began infiltrating the board.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Dave is moronic

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Uhhh 4.75 is actually five stars because uhhh and uhhh you know and what makes a star 5.5 instead of 5.75 is uhhhh you know what I mean?

    Does anyone listen to this moronic homosexual genuinely?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Tonikan does. Anyone you see repeating his bad takes too.

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Maybe he shouldn't have started handing out 5+ star matches like candy?

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    He is right. 4.5 and 4.75 matches have won MOTY. But that was before he went moronic and scaled shit up

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I for one use Dave's scale the way it's intended.
    >If a match is 5 or above I'll go out of my way to watch it
    >If a show has several 4-5 range matches and I was thinking about checking it out I'll do so
    >don't go out of my way to watch anything lower.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Using it this way, you would miss out on Hogan v Rock.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >You would miss on on gay finisher spam with no psychology between two over the hill shitters

        Thanks

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >reddit spacing
          >hates one of the most important matches in wrestling history
          Yeah, I'm thinking you should go back.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            it wasn't important in the slightest

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That's not what a scoring system is for. A recommendation is not a score. If you want to recommend something then say "you should go out of your way to watch this", not "19 stars the greatest match to ever happen in Cleveland".

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Anon what the frick do you think the point of a scoring system if not to suggest that someone should watch a thing? What other outcome is there from it? Especially from a rating system that theoretically has no upper bound.

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    DOWN SINCE
    DAVE ONE ISH

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >4.75 out of 7 is great

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    4.75s got MoTY back when he was using a five scale, now it goes up to seven. Is he moronic?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >have been
      moron
      >now it goes up to seven.
      and matches less than seven have won WON MOTY for the last 5 years

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        wdsoph

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          iayc

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    STFU with this.forced gay thread again and again and again. Trebor Woodhouse, please have a nice day

  20. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Dave always says his ratings are opinions unless he's trying to win an argument about matches and then they're objective.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      no argument?

  21. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >y-yeah 5 stars basically doesn’t mean anything, stop asking why WWE is hard capped at 4.75 while AEW gets one for every other tv match

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *