Why did Man City, Man United, and Aston Villa vote against it?
https://twitter.com/eurofootcom/status/1784947697470066809
 Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
 UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
BREAKING: Premier League clubs have AGREED to a spending cap
Is it actually a cap or is it so large that it'll only affect 2 clubs?
its capped at either 85 percent of your own clubs reported earnings or three times what the shittest club earns per year in tv revenue.
so basically unless certain clubs find a way around it they cant use their sugar daddies anymore
>Is it actually a cap or is it so large that it'll only affect 2 clubs?
only chelsea would've broken it this year (newcastle would've probably spent to the cap if they could but they had no wiggle room under current ffp)
It's actually meaningless for city because it's way above the CL limits
its meaningless for city because they will just continue cooking the books
hehe
because we're not fricking communists?
What does it feel like wrapping your dsls around a bwc?
If only BWC wasn't a myth
O MALACHI
Based Arsenal and Liverpool.
Speak for yourself butthole. Haaland owes me money.
EPL would be way more competitive if there was no spend cap
Lol what? Citywinslol is competitive?
Do you honestly think Newcastle couldn't outspend the frick out of City? Or that the billionaires that own other clubs couldn't afford to compete? Or that clubs that make enough to self sustain with money left over (United) don't have the cash?
>Hello.
>We are Chelsea.
>We have an Hotel (or 2) we would like to sell you
same ole shite
with the same ole loopholes
what it do be mean in practice?
shit clubs can over spend until they go into administration like Everton
Super League soon
Now they only need a Tebas wannabe to screw up the EPL
the only cringe thing tebas did was save barca from bankruptcy
rules aren't respected in the epl anyway
Because Man City being allowed to cheat FFP is how they’re able to sign all these players. The team itself doesn’t bring in any revenue. If there’s a cap, their days will be numbered
Does it matter since no punishment is ever handed out in the first place
>Socialism [chudjack face]
>Socialism, football [soijack face]
I hate you guys
Please tell me that is photoshopped? Otherwise it's a real humiliation ritual. 🙁
Is that the guy that was raped in a Romanian prison?
He was not raped
He did have sex with romanian men though
Exposed for being gay
Checkmate
disliked
>eating goyslop
They both lost
he wants to be giani kiriță so bad
>taller and not bald and still young
who really lost
Man clubs voting against is understandable.
What isn't is how Newcastle and Chelsea voted in favour.
Very interesting concept, it's one of the things that I like about the nba.
>agree on spending cap
>city ignores it
>nothing happens
This would be good and a role model for everywhere else. If it's done right, no bullshitting. But I recognize it's kind of hard, because putting the cap too high means it's useless and putting it too low means smaller clubs cannot catch up no matter what. I guess you'd have to add some more additional "prize money pots", like for using youth and or homegrown players. Perhaps allowing lower-ranked teams to spend a bit more than the champions could also work
But in principle, this is direly needed indeed. Clubs cannot work sustainably for shit on their own, especially if they already have big bucks. Examples include Barca, Juventus, Chelsea, >Schalke, HSV. This can't go well in the long run, so introducing some sort of barrier is great, especially in the face of billionaires going on shopping sprees
this unironically helps city, their team is built they only need to buy one or two players here and there, this spending caps affects clubs that want to improve and get better in order to compete against city.
Short term, exactly this.
Long term might get more complicated. But i get why united, who just got ready to spend the frick out of everything, are pissed.
if the punishment for breaking the cap is just a "tax" (£ fine) like in burger sports....
Thats a soft cap like the MLB or NBA, the NFL has a hard cap.
better yet:
>no foreigners (except irish maybe)
>only white players allowed
Congratulations "premier" league for becoming worse than the danish championship
What do you know?
What i know is that my team would obliterate your farmers league
This, the premier league is not >that< ahead of everyone else (compared to the NFL) where they can do doing something like that
So is it another bullshit ''cap'' like FFP where clubs can spend relative to their income or will it be a real hard cap like in the NHL?
You can't have a real hard cap with football like you can with American sports. The NHL, MLB, NBA, and NFL can all do it because they basically run those sports by virtue of relatively few other countries taking them seriously and the ones that do are poor.
Football is international so it doesn't work. That's why morons say things like
>Clubs should only be allowed to spend X per window on transfers and wages and that makes fings fairerer!
Even if UEFA ratified that then it doesn't stop another organisation coming into being and saying
>Join our organisation instead and we won't have a cap
If you're a player where would you rather play?
This basic economics that everyone is either too braindead to understand or they just ignore it in favour of what they like the sound of.
I'll put it a different way for the short bus kids at the back.
You work for a company in a Fictionalistan. The policy of Fictionalistan is that you can't make more than $100 a week. That's the maximum you can ever hope to earn.
Meanwhile there's another country that we'll call Nonmoronistan. Nonmoronistan doesn't have this policy.
Now you have a choice to make. You can do the exact same job in Fictionalistan and work your way up to $100pw while Mr Shekelstein keeps the rest (those yachts aren't cheap) or you can move to Nonmoronistan and be on $400pw starting. Which one are you going to choose?
This differs from the NFL/MLB/NHL/NBA because there are already well established football leagues who already have a lot of income. If you wanted to compete with the NFL/MLB/NHL/NBA you're getting on at the ground floor and you better have a substantial amount of backing to even get it off the ground.
The tl;dr is that the only entities this proposal benefits are israeli owners and JF clubs.
Every player that has played under pep guardiola has taken PED's
Spanish authorities’ investigations uncovered a shockingly wide doping network around Eufemiano Fuentes. The evidence implicated most of Europe’s leading cyclists, but people weren’t overly shocked at the confirmation of something that most suspected anyway.The most compelling evidence produced by Operacion Puerto suggested that it wasn’t just cyclists but footballers who were “treated” by Fuentes. This was of course around the time when Spanish teams and athletes had started to dominate their respective fields. Fuentes has admitted in the past he worked with Guardiola. He is also alleged to have said “If I would talk, the Spanish football team would be stripped of the 2010 World Cup”
With the nandrolone (an anabolic steroid) scandals of the early 2000s, where multiple bans were handed down to Guardiola. Guardiola was playing at Brescia at the time, where his club doctor was Ramon Segura – the same Segura who worked for Pep during his highly successful spell managing Barcelona.
3 doctors who worked with Lance Armstrong’s US Postal cycling team received lifetime bans from sport for providing athletes with EPO, blood transfusions and masking agents. One of cycling’s most famous ‘doping doctors’, Luis del Moral is also working with Barcelona under the guise of “medical advisor”. FC Barcelona haven’t made a statement on del Moral’s ban, which prohibits him from working in any sport which has signed up to the WADA code of conduct. It would be interesting to hear why they employed del Moral and what his specific role was within the team.
How is this fair to United who have to spend an additional 40m United tax on 20m shitters
Based. You almost have a sport now. All you're missing is the draft, commercial breaks and multiball
Still can't believe the Eagles got DeJean.
Eagles fans have been memeing that into a reality for months.
>white cornerbacks
he will be in the UFL within 3 years
You wish. They changed the kick return rules and he's a good returner.
Cap leagues have soul, it'll be good for the league innit.
Go Ahead Eagles?
I don't get it
Hincha de boca btw
citybros its over
..where can i buy a man united kit
surely this will work just like financial fair play
They should have a hard cap like the NFL. Based on overall league revenue, each team gets the same amount of money to pay players and you have to manage your team and balance your roster based on it.
Everyone gets the same chance to be successful but shit organizations stay shit because they're incompetent
the problem is the champions league is more prestigious and bigger prize. if they do this they will have no chance to win in european competitions due to all the other leagues not doing it so the good players will frick off there for more money. it would work if you could make every league agree to it
you can still win the champions league with a salary cap if your team is sovlful enough
maybe in the 2000s where porto and that dogshit liverpool team sovled their way to the top but nowadays with these teams owned by countries etc i doubt it
>hmmmm... I don't want to make 600k/w. I'd rather play for a soulful club and make 80k/w.
>My team depends a lot on me, but I'm happy underperforming players like Nicholas Jackson can earn as much as me. I'd hate to make more money than other fellow players.
>We players don't NEED so much money. ~~*The board*~~ know what to do with all the money.
>Winning a balon d'or doesn't mean I need a better contract. I play for the glory and for the supporters' happiness.
>Saudi Arabia? Yikes! Do you know how they treat LGBTQIA2+ folks there? And what about oil money? I'm literally shaking rn!
this is bringing back painful memories of klopp trying to convince coutinho to stay with his 90k contract and not go to barcelona..
bad times
A salary cap only works when the league implementing it is so far beyond their rivals that even the lowest paid players are paid better there than in the rival's league. The NHL's league minimum is better than what 99% of KHL players get (and it's actually paid on time too)
Just like the FFP, bigger clubs will find a way to bend the rules.
Just watch clubs like Girona buying top players and sending them on loan to City after year.
>Just watch clubs like Girona buying top players and sending them on loan to City after year.
2 minutes in and joao has already solved it
its over
Why would Villa vote against this?
What is their end game?
they have the 3rd richest owner in the league
To spend money and be a consistent top 4 club. Villa has wealthy owners.
They've secured top 4 and have cl money coming in.
With this everyone underneath can spend to overtake them again
man c115y be like no cap fr
England will never win a UCL or UEL cup ever again
This is a who pays the most wins system and you shot your foot