Nah just shit journalism would be my bet, probably wasn't too dissimilar to this: >have 10 min interview >discuss tactics, players, strategy >Fierce rivalry, what would be your message to the fans? >Uh just behave, nobody wants trouble. >SOUTHGATE DESPERATELY URGES FANS TO BEHAVE AHEAD OF RIVAL CLASH
portugal got a much harder path to win the euro and they actually won.
ukraine
denmark
and the worst italy in decades yet they choked and had to win thanks to refball in their way to the final
2 years ago
Anonymous
>portugal got a much harder path to win the euro and they actually won.
lmao what
croatia -> poland -> wales
as opposed to
germany -> ukraine -> denmark
2 years ago
Anonymous
? its a much harder path LMAO, that croatia went to the finals of the next WC, Poland is better than denmark and wales which was the easiest one is better than ukraine and also the next WC champion in the finals.
meanwhile you got the worst germany, the worst italy and two conventionally easy teams.
both were easy paths and but englands was easier thats the point of the comparison
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Yes I would take Germany and Italy in my path, of the mighty Poland and Wales
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Poland is better than denmark
you are delusional
2 years ago
Anonymous
At the time we were lmao.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Poland is better than Denmark
LOL
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Poland is better than denmark
Denmark went almost 4 years without losing a single competitive game between 2016 and 2020. You're a downie
2 years ago
Anonymous
lets not exaggerate lad, we got an easy path
despite germany being at its worst in decade they are still far better than the 3 teams we faced on route to the final
and so was denmark who are on their best form since they won the euro in 1992 (they couldve and probably wouldve won this one as well ahd they not been rigged by the english though)
but yes ukraine is the worst of all the 8 sides both us and them faced, and italy are laughably bad ringht now and are much worse than france, it was a major fluke win on their part, but cheers to them anyway
2 years ago
Anonymous
portugal were 3rd in groups, it's an asterix win
2 years ago
Anonymous
well it was hosted in gaul
2 years ago
Anonymous
hah
2 years ago
Anonymous
kek
portugal were 3rd in groups, it's an asterix win
cope
2 years ago
Anonymous
We were actually good during the euros, we've become a joke after it though
2 years ago
Anonymous
That was the best Italy team in decades you freak. They hold the record for the longest unbeaten streak of a national team.
2 years ago
Anonymous
excluvively vs shitters though
best best sides they didnt lose agaisnt were belgium, spain, and england, who are all frauds, and that happened to be in the run to the final
they also didnt outright beat 2 of them, needing penalties, but spain and england are notoriously bad at those
it was fluke mostly, like greeces win, but congrats to them anyway, especially since they failed to qualify for 2 wcs in a row, proving that they are a pretty bad nt right now
2 years ago
Anonymous
>the worst italy in decades
this has to be a troll. Either that or the summer influx has truly begun
Its not a defence, thats just how our journalism works. Also if you want to berate Southgate, there's plenty of evidence he's a shit manager, you don't need to bring in the fact he's a cùck
not really, I mean yes, journalists are fricks and yours seem to be especially vile but this c**t has done it times and times again, he literally loves his own moronic voice, loves reading about himself, there is no single one more narcissistic c**t at the international level, he just loves to have an opinion on everything, especially if it's spoonfed by the globohomo
british journalists ask the same question over and over until he gives some kind of vague response and then frames it like he ran into a market and screamed his opinion like a town crier. The journo asked him what he thought about the last time England went to Germany where 2 pissed fans made nazi salutes and it was ironically treated like a declaration of war. What's he supposed to say other than "i hope they don't do that"
Also quite enjoy the implication from some in this thread that saying "yeah don't be c**ts" is globohomo.
2 years ago
Anonymous
no you dumb c**t, it's about your likes of paddy mccracker dumbfrick connor coady coming out with 'we need to educate them' statements, as if a 40 iq mouthbreather who's kicking a leather ball for living could educate anybody on anything, the sole attitude that you're some kind of a god's gift to earth is laughable when coming from such frickheads
2 years ago
Anonymous
So you think the fans should go there and cause trouble? Or do you agree with Southgate?
I'm not saying I agree with everything out of Southgate's mouth but people are unironically getting mad at him for taking the somehow controversial stance of "It would be bad for fans to fight"
This is just not a story and as such this thread should not be about Southgates political views but about journalistic integrity and their failure to report on things properly.
You remember when anytime Trump said something and it wasn't really a big deal but people on the left got mad and everyone started calling it Trump Derangement Syndrome. Well its not unique to Trump and its not unique to the left.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>So you think the fans should go there and cause trouble?
no, I think that mister 'I have an opinion on everything in the world' should just shut the frick up and when asked such questions, he should underline that he's focused on football and his team only and all the peripheral shit does not concern him, instead he wants to get the brownie points so he'll also take a lot of shit for opening his gob
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Last time England played Germany there were sections of fans who performed nazi salutes and started fights with other fans, what would be your message to the fans ahead of this game? >No comment
Yeah I'm sure thats a much smarter answer than "Behave yourself lads" and absolutely wouldn't result in negative press.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>wouldn't result in negative press.
glad we're agreeing on the fact that he does only care about how he and the NT are perceived in the press and talking the good talk then
2 years ago
Anonymous
>only cares
no you moron, he's doing the bare minimum to avoid pointless controversy. It's not like he's being asked football questions and responding with "who cares about who i'm playing right back when theres SO MUCH INJUSTICE"
2 years ago
Anonymous
How are you still mad at southgate when its clearly a failure of quality journalism and the predictability of that that makes him give bland answers?
If journalists were better then he could happily say something like "I can't control the fans and will stay focussed on football" without fearing getting drummed out of a job. Its perfectly sensible of him to just go with a very normal opinion of "Yeah they should behave" simply to avoid the inevitable [...] headline.
In fact I could make an argument that hes keeping himself and the whole squad focussed on football by giving the simple and predictable answer rather than saying something which would create inevitable controversy even though it shouldn't which is the fault of the press, which is what I've been telling you all along.
But don't strain your brain thinking too much about consequences eh?
keep defending your israelite coach, speaks volumes how cucked you already are lmao, enjoy your kneeling, gay armbands and educational crusade
2 years ago
Anonymous
I don't even like Southgate m8, hes fricking shite. I'm saying you're a fricking moron for getting upset about him for no reason in this instance and you're doing that because you don't like his politics. You should be getting mad at the press for being shit or be recognising that he just played the game here and didn't do anything remotely controversial.
Deranging yourself into somehow thinking he has done something wrong in this specific instance is some next level mental gymnastics.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Based.
2 years ago
Anonymous
How are you still mad at southgate when its clearly a failure of quality journalism and the predictability of that that makes him give bland answers?
If journalists were better then he could happily say something like "I can't control the fans and will stay focussed on football" without fearing getting drummed out of a job. Its perfectly sensible of him to just go with a very normal opinion of "Yeah they should behave" simply to avoid the inevitable
SOUTHGATE REFUSES TO CONDEMN NAZI SALUTES OR VIOLENCE AGAINST CHILDREN
headline.
In fact I could make an argument that hes keeping himself and the whole squad focussed on football by giving the simple and predictable answer rather than saying something which would create inevitable controversy even though it shouldn't which is the fault of the press, which is what I've been telling you all along.
But don't strain your brain thinking too much about consequences eh?
2 years ago
Anonymous
SOUTHGATE REFUSES TO CONDEMN NAZI SALUTES OR VIOLENCE AGAINST CHILDREN
2 years ago
Anonymous
>when asked such questions, he should underline that he's focused on football and his team only
thats the part you're misinterpreting, british journos are scum and will only ask these kinds of questions, they take up well over a half of any press conference and if they don't answer they get pressed, and if they actively refuse to answer its framed as them supporting racism because clickbait. Southgate replying with a single sentence of "lets hope everyone behaves" is as close to a "frick off and move on" answer as possible. Not to mention the FA will be advising his responses so he's always going to say he supports the kneeling and shit when asked because if you don't directly say you support it, it will be taken as you actively do not support it, which will cause all of the FA executives to have to apologise to their wifes boyfriend and they will be upset at him. I don't think southgate is virtue signalling or acting high and mighty here, he's saying what he has to in as few words as possible to minimise scrunity and controversy within the england squad. You also have to consider the fact that he has to manage a bunch of dumb uppity nigs who will sulk and quit the first chance they get to act the victim, so he has that to think about when answering these questions
tldr i cant see the point of him doing anything else while hes england manager, this is by far the path of least resistance
I honestly belive Southgate's primary responsibility is to act as head of PR for the FA. I'm pretty sure the actual football matters are handled by his coaches and his job is talk about racism and stuff.
Plenty out there with stupid levels of cope implying players are tired which is dumb given every c**t on that pitch hadn't played for at least 2 weeks except TAA but mostly people recognise its little more than glorified friendlies and was an experimental setup with fringe players which is fair tbh.
Nah just shit journalism would be my bet, probably wasn't too dissimilar to this:
>have 10 min interview
>discuss tactics, players, strategy
>Fierce rivalry, what would be your message to the fans?
>Uh just behave, nobody wants trouble.
>SOUTHGATE DESPERATELY URGES FANS TO BEHAVE AHEAD OF RIVAL CLASH
why do anglos keep defending this failure? he bottled the only chance you had to win a trophy
screencap this and see you in 6 months time
Well.
He's got them their first chance to win a trophy since 1966
portugal got a much harder path to win the euro and they actually won.
ukraine
denmark
and the worst italy in decades yet they choked and had to win thanks to refball in their way to the final
>portugal got a much harder path to win the euro and they actually won.
lmao what
croatia -> poland -> wales
as opposed to
germany -> ukraine -> denmark
? its a much harder path LMAO, that croatia went to the finals of the next WC, Poland is better than denmark and wales which was the easiest one is better than ukraine and also the next WC champion in the finals.
meanwhile you got the worst germany, the worst italy and two conventionally easy teams.
both were easy paths and but englands was easier thats the point of the comparison
>Yes I would take Germany and Italy in my path, of the mighty Poland and Wales
>Poland is better than denmark
you are delusional
At the time we were lmao.
>Poland is better than Denmark
LOL
>Poland is better than denmark
Denmark went almost 4 years without losing a single competitive game between 2016 and 2020. You're a downie
lets not exaggerate lad, we got an easy path
despite germany being at its worst in decade they are still far better than the 3 teams we faced on route to the final
and so was denmark who are on their best form since they won the euro in 1992 (they couldve and probably wouldve won this one as well ahd they not been rigged by the english though)
but yes ukraine is the worst of all the 8 sides both us and them faced, and italy are laughably bad ringht now and are much worse than france, it was a major fluke win on their part, but cheers to them anyway
portugal were 3rd in groups, it's an asterix win
well it was hosted in gaul
hah
kek
cope
We were actually good during the euros, we've become a joke after it though
That was the best Italy team in decades you freak. They hold the record for the longest unbeaten streak of a national team.
excluvively vs shitters though
best best sides they didnt lose agaisnt were belgium, spain, and england, who are all frauds, and that happened to be in the run to the final
they also didnt outright beat 2 of them, needing penalties, but spain and england are notoriously bad at those
it was fluke mostly, like greeces win, but congrats to them anyway, especially since they failed to qualify for 2 wcs in a row, proving that they are a pretty bad nt right now
>the worst italy in decades
this has to be a troll. Either that or the summer influx has truly begun
Better to fail with one of your own at the helm than to fail with a foreign manager like Eriksen or Capello.
Its not a defence, thats just how our journalism works. Also if you want to berate Southgate, there's plenty of evidence he's a shit manager, you don't need to bring in the fact he's a cùck
They love the concept of glorious failure
>the only chance you had to win a trophy
Cope. You said this in 2018 too, and you'll be saying it in December.
I don't he's a fricking moronic c**t that put his cuckold fetish in front of winning the fricking euros
Because for England standards he's doing quite well as a manager
Journalist are scum
So is Southgate
If Emma can avoid journalists probing with woke BS, why can't a grown man like Southgate? That's a terrible excuse.
>Tennist
>Female
vs
>Coach of the national team in the country's most important sport
Surely you can figure this out, Nigel
not really, I mean yes, journalists are fricks and yours seem to be especially vile but this c**t has done it times and times again, he literally loves his own moronic voice, loves reading about himself, there is no single one more narcissistic c**t at the international level, he just loves to have an opinion on everything, especially if it's spoonfed by the globohomo
he's a fricking homosexual to put it short
british journalists ask the same question over and over until he gives some kind of vague response and then frames it like he ran into a market and screamed his opinion like a town crier. The journo asked him what he thought about the last time England went to Germany where 2 pissed fans made nazi salutes and it was ironically treated like a declaration of war. What's he supposed to say other than "i hope they don't do that"
Also quite enjoy the implication from some in this thread that saying "yeah don't be c**ts" is globohomo.
no you dumb c**t, it's about your likes of paddy mccracker dumbfrick connor coady coming out with 'we need to educate them' statements, as if a 40 iq mouthbreather who's kicking a leather ball for living could educate anybody on anything, the sole attitude that you're some kind of a god's gift to earth is laughable when coming from such frickheads
So you think the fans should go there and cause trouble? Or do you agree with Southgate?
I'm not saying I agree with everything out of Southgate's mouth but people are unironically getting mad at him for taking the somehow controversial stance of "It would be bad for fans to fight"
This is just not a story and as such this thread should not be about Southgates political views but about journalistic integrity and their failure to report on things properly.
You remember when anytime Trump said something and it wasn't really a big deal but people on the left got mad and everyone started calling it Trump Derangement Syndrome. Well its not unique to Trump and its not unique to the left.
>So you think the fans should go there and cause trouble?
no, I think that mister 'I have an opinion on everything in the world' should just shut the frick up and when asked such questions, he should underline that he's focused on football and his team only and all the peripheral shit does not concern him, instead he wants to get the brownie points so he'll also take a lot of shit for opening his gob
>Last time England played Germany there were sections of fans who performed nazi salutes and started fights with other fans, what would be your message to the fans ahead of this game?
>No comment
Yeah I'm sure thats a much smarter answer than "Behave yourself lads" and absolutely wouldn't result in negative press.
>wouldn't result in negative press.
glad we're agreeing on the fact that he does only care about how he and the NT are perceived in the press and talking the good talk then
>only cares
no you moron, he's doing the bare minimum to avoid pointless controversy. It's not like he's being asked football questions and responding with "who cares about who i'm playing right back when theres SO MUCH INJUSTICE"
keep defending your israelite coach, speaks volumes how cucked you already are lmao, enjoy your kneeling, gay armbands and educational crusade
I don't even like Southgate m8, hes fricking shite. I'm saying you're a fricking moron for getting upset about him for no reason in this instance and you're doing that because you don't like his politics. You should be getting mad at the press for being shit or be recognising that he just played the game here and didn't do anything remotely controversial.
Deranging yourself into somehow thinking he has done something wrong in this specific instance is some next level mental gymnastics.
Based.
How are you still mad at southgate when its clearly a failure of quality journalism and the predictability of that that makes him give bland answers?
If journalists were better then he could happily say something like "I can't control the fans and will stay focussed on football" without fearing getting drummed out of a job. Its perfectly sensible of him to just go with a very normal opinion of "Yeah they should behave" simply to avoid the inevitable
headline.
In fact I could make an argument that hes keeping himself and the whole squad focussed on football by giving the simple and predictable answer rather than saying something which would create inevitable controversy even though it shouldn't which is the fault of the press, which is what I've been telling you all along.
But don't strain your brain thinking too much about consequences eh?
SOUTHGATE REFUSES TO CONDEMN NAZI SALUTES OR VIOLENCE AGAINST CHILDREN
>when asked such questions, he should underline that he's focused on football and his team only
thats the part you're misinterpreting, british journos are scum and will only ask these kinds of questions, they take up well over a half of any press conference and if they don't answer they get pressed, and if they actively refuse to answer its framed as them supporting racism because clickbait. Southgate replying with a single sentence of "lets hope everyone behaves" is as close to a "frick off and move on" answer as possible. Not to mention the FA will be advising his responses so he's always going to say he supports the kneeling and shit when asked because if you don't directly say you support it, it will be taken as you actively do not support it, which will cause all of the FA executives to have to apologise to their wifes boyfriend and they will be upset at him. I don't think southgate is virtue signalling or acting high and mighty here, he's saying what he has to in as few words as possible to minimise scrunity and controversy within the england squad. You also have to consider the fact that he has to manage a bunch of dumb uppity nigs who will sulk and quit the first chance they get to act the victim, so he has that to think about when answering these questions
tldr i cant see the point of him doing anything else while hes england manager, this is by far the path of least resistance
This.
If nobody likes journalist scum, why don't we all boycott their shit?
THERE WERE TEN GERMAN BOMBERS IN THE AIR
we are playing England?
I HATE THIS c**t SO MUCH
WHY DID HE PLAY 3 DEFENDERS, 2 WING BACKS AND 2 HOLDING MIDFIELDERS AGAINST FRICKING HUNGARY
Lol
He wants the englands to kneel before the germans. I want to see a brawl tbh.
I honestly belive Southgate's primary responsibility is to act as head of PR for the FA. I'm pretty sure the actual football matters are handled by his coaches and his job is talk about racism and stuff.
How do you know that lmao? Some quote that could've indicated ~15 seconds of thought?
>England 0 Iran 0
>England 0 Wales 1 (Bale 90+4)
>England 1 (Kane pen 30) USA 3 (Pulisic 74, Maguire og 83, DeAndre Muttberg 90+7)
it was written
it's the Maguire OG for me
>DeAndre Muttberg
are there any bong-articles talking about the match?
which they lost?
against hungary?
HUNGARY!?
Plenty out there with stupid levels of cope implying players are tired which is dumb given every c**t on that pitch hadn't played for at least 2 weeks except TAA but mostly people recognise its little more than glorified friendlies and was an experimental setup with fringe players which is fair tbh.