The truth of the matter is the FA cannot charge Man City or strip their titles. Doing so would hurt the image of the Premier League and potentially drive advertisers and money away from "the biggest league in the world". Italian football never really recovered from their massive match fixing scandal and so other regulators are terrified that if they come down hard on cheating the same thing could happen to them.
People don't know the difference between FFP and Profit and Sustainability rules. Don't bother trying to teach anyone the difference though. Most people are too moronic for that.
it's because he keeps correctly pointing out all the dodgy decisions City get and questioning why so many PL refs go to referee games in UAE for huge sums of money
Questions for ABCs: >why did that portuguse hacker target City? >if they're guilty, why couldn't UEFA build a convincing case using the 5 million + documents released? >why did UEFA agree the sponsorship deals were fair market value? >why would multinational auditors not connected to City commit fraud to protect them? >if something was afoot, why wouldn't Mansour just route the funds through Etihad anyway?
>why would multinational auditors not connected to City commit fraud to protect them?
Auditing is meaningless now, this decade has been scandal after scandal of them doing exactly that.
>punishes Everton by taking 10 points away from them in the middle of the season >punishes Nottingham Forest and pushes them into a relegation battle >City on the other hand has been "under investigation" for years now by the Premier League and UEFA.
The Premier League is so blatantly rigged. They took 10 points away from Everton and then gave them back 4 once it became evident that they weren't gonna get relegated. It's almost like they were trying to create a proper scrap at the bottom of the table. Same reason why Liverpool and Arsenal have been refballed out of points this season.
They are obviously guilty. If they are "proven innocent" that is a result of corruption. This is a completely reasonable opinion to have and obviously protected speech.
No they aren't. The charges have not been proven. You wanting to believe them doesn't mean they are proven. City are innocent until proven guilty.
>He speaks as if they are already guilty
Give me one specific instance where he's said with reference to a specific charge that they're guilty of it. Just one. >Inb4 they cheated.
Again, name one specific charge that he's said they're guilty of.
Actually some of the charges have been proven in court once already by UEFA. The fact that the evidence used was time barred from admission led to the withdrawal of the case. There is no such time limit on evidence in the Prem case so those charges will be proven again.
They are obviously guilty. If they are "proven innocent" that is a result of corruption. This is a completely reasonable opinion to have and obviously protected speech.
Rules, fraud, regulations, 115 charges etc ect... all irrelevant. The PL is the golden goose and "Manchester City" represent a terminal threat to its global dominance. You allowed an oil backed state masquerading as a football club free reign in the league and this is the result. 6 titles in 7 years and it will be 7 in 8 next season. The PL will be forced to act to protect itself from competitors when "Manchester City" start hitting 10 in a row. >But but they can't do that!
Watch them, it's either see the golden goose die or boot "Manchester City" out of the comp. They don't have a choice
The PL is the UKs biggest cultural export, it brings in billions to the economy every single year through taxes, tourism, investment etc etc.
Allowing a oil backed state masquerading as a football club to run rough shod over the league will damage the product and thus damage a massive revenue stream. They won't have a choice
The Prem has got more profitable since Man City got gud. Plastics like the predictability, it gives them security in their glory hunting choices.
"Manchester City" is only on 4 in row (or will be in a week or so)
The PL can delude themselves into thinking this era is just another Man U..... when they're nothing alike. No other PL club can compete with a state, even other state back entities can't because of financial fair play. In 10 years when "Manchester City has won 80% of the trophies available... that's when they'll be forced to act
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
When the new rules come in every club will be able to spend roughly as much as Chelsea/City have spent assembling their current team. Newcastle will be fine.
>The Prem has got more profitable since Man City got gud
>When this is taken into account, there is in fact a decrease in the per game value of the rights under the new deal (approx. £6.2m per game) when compared with the value under both the existing deal (approx. £8.11m per game) and the 2016/17 – 2018/19 deal (approx. £10.19m per game).
The PL is the UKs biggest cultural export, it brings in billions to the economy every single year through taxes, tourism, investment etc etc.
Allowing a oil backed state masquerading as a football club to run rough shod over the league will damage the product and thus damage a massive revenue stream. They won't have a choice
lol thereäs nothing english at all about the pl
your land is run by oligarchs
I stopped watching yuro footy because of this. It's just crazy how psg, man city, madrid and barça have a pass to do basically anything they want. Ref decisions are obviously biased "unintendedly" towards the same teams. People are just too moronic to realize it.
I hope everyone slowly stops watching those rigged competitions, so this shithousery ends, but shitskins care too much about teams from countries they'll likely never visit
>anglos think they can throw the breaks on selling out to the highest bidder decades after thatcher started the mass rape of their lands
you can't lmfao
115
This means they know they've won their case
The truth of the matter is the FA cannot charge Man City or strip their titles. Doing so would hurt the image of the Premier League and potentially drive advertisers and money away from "the biggest league in the world". Italian football never really recovered from their massive match fixing scandal and so other regulators are terrified that if they come down hard on cheating the same thing could happen to them.
calm down arsewog, 0 CLs
Not an argument tho
Imagine if the FA vacated all of Manchester City's honours and awarded them to nobody.
>the FA cannot charge Man City
The Prem has charged City, not the FA. The charges will be dropped because they are silly
People don't know the difference between FFP and Profit and Sustainability rules. Don't bother trying to teach anyone the difference though. Most people are too moronic for that.
cope trump won
In other words, 2008 was the point of no return
*1992
it truly was the point of no return
City not reporting sponsorship revenue accurately isn't exactly match fixing
but it is fraud and if it was a just world all involved would be imprisoned for it but we know rich people don't go to prison
Its not fraud, the worst it is is breaking the Prem's rules. They haven't done anything illegal.
>false accounting isn't fraud
OK moron
But breaking the rules even according to Arab arselickers such as yourself
It is because they owe taxes on those wages they paid under the table
>fraudulent accounting is not fraud
Nothing has been proven. Reminder the charges involve marginally misreporting sponsorship revenue.
>Doing so would hurt the image of the Premier League
your rigging refBlack folk are doing that already lol
the singular good post in the thread i did not actually read until now
Has 115 bought the rights to the number 115?
Big if true.
it's because he keeps correctly pointing out all the dodgy decisions City get and questioning why so many PL refs go to referee games in UAE for huge sums of money
>"Brent Di Cesare"
I don't trust anyone who changes their name to fit in or disguise themselves. It's a disgustingly israeli practice.
He was a copper when he did it though
Questions for ABCs:
>why did that portuguse hacker target City?
>if they're guilty, why couldn't UEFA build a convincing case using the 5 million + documents released?
>why did UEFA agree the sponsorship deals were fair market value?
>why would multinational auditors not connected to City commit fraud to protect them?
>if something was afoot, why wouldn't Mansour just route the funds through Etihad anyway?
Whole reason PL is charging clubs is because they are shit scared of the Independent Football Regulator.
Yeah it seemed like a political move to buy time
The governing bodies of the game are absolutely petrified of anyone controlling them despite it having been necessary for decades.
>why would multinational auditors not connected to City commit fraud to protect them?
Auditing is meaningless now, this decade has been scandal after scandal of them doing exactly that.
you cant use hacked or stolen documents in court moron
only the US government with parallel construction can get away with this
Enron has multinational auditors
Are they going to add charges and continually cry about it like the Scousers?
has der spiegel been right about anything ever? absolute shitrag
>punishes Everton by taking 10 points away from them in the middle of the season
>punishes Nottingham Forest and pushes them into a relegation battle
>City on the other hand has been "under investigation" for years now by the Premier League and UEFA.
The Premier League is so blatantly rigged. They took 10 points away from Everton and then gave them back 4 once it became evident that they weren't gonna get relegated. It's almost like they were trying to create a proper scrap at the bottom of the table. Same reason why Liverpool and Arsenal have been refballed out of points this season.
City are innocent
>
>
Tbf, fricking everton deserves to die already in 2nd division, they are even worse than wienerroaches
Also
>Tp
>Tf
>Mutt sports
Goldbridge speaks as if they are already guilty, they sent him a cease and desist informing him that the charges have not been proven.
>the charges have not been proven.
That shouldn't stop goldbridge from talking about the charges tho. Or are 115 buying the charges as well?
He speaks as if they are already guilty
No they aren't. The charges have not been proven. You wanting to believe them doesn't mean they are proven. City are innocent until proven guilty.
>He speaks as if they are already guilty
Give me one specific instance where he's said with reference to a specific charge that they're guilty of it. Just one.
>Inb4 they cheated.
Again, name one specific charge that he's said they're guilty of.
Actually some of the charges have been proven in court once already by UEFA. The fact that the evidence used was time barred from admission led to the withdrawal of the case. There is no such time limit on evidence in the Prem case so those charges will be proven again.
>"I haven't read the judgement"
They are obviously guilty. If they are "proven innocent" that is a result of corruption. This is a completely reasonable opinion to have and obviously protected speech.
riggitini cittini
homosexual city
115
two more weeks, chuds
Good. Slander is not acceptable.
City has 115
Liverpool have >>97
What other teams have forbidden numbers?
Brazil 71
Arsenal have 0
These "people" should be living in constant fear of being disappeared.
City fans (all 2 of them) report posts on Fhite if they mention the 115 charges btw
Rules, fraud, regulations, 115 charges etc ect... all irrelevant. The PL is the golden goose and "Manchester City" represent a terminal threat to its global dominance. You allowed an oil backed state masquerading as a football club free reign in the league and this is the result. 6 titles in 7 years and it will be 7 in 8 next season. The PL will be forced to act to protect itself from competitors when "Manchester City" start hitting 10 in a row.
>But but they can't do that!
Watch them, it's either see the golden goose die or boot "Manchester City" out of the comp. They don't have a choice
They can just let Newcastle have free reign too and then you've got a title race, problem solved.
There's going to be some legacy tears when they are found not guilty on all charges
The UK government won't let anything jeopardize their relations with their precious oil sheikh allies
Yeah, those MoD contracts are the goose's that keep laying golden eggs.
The PL is the UKs biggest cultural export, it brings in billions to the economy every single year through taxes, tourism, investment etc etc.
Allowing a oil backed state masquerading as a football club to run rough shod over the league will damage the product and thus damage a massive revenue stream. They won't have a choice
This has already happened and they haven't done anything.
"Manchester City" is only on 4 in row (or will be in a week or so)
The PL can delude themselves into thinking this era is just another Man U..... when they're nothing alike. No other PL club can compete with a state, even other state back entities can't because of financial fair play. In 10 years when "Manchester City has won 80% of the trophies available... that's when they'll be forced to act
When the new rules come in every club will be able to spend roughly as much as Chelsea/City have spent assembling their current team. Newcastle will be fine.
The Prem has got more profitable since Man City got gud. Plastics like the predictability, it gives them security in their glory hunting choices.
>The Prem has got more profitable since Man City got gud
>When this is taken into account, there is in fact a decrease in the per game value of the rights under the new deal (approx. £6.2m per game) when compared with the value under both the existing deal (approx. £8.11m per game) and the 2016/17 – 2018/19 deal (approx. £10.19m per game).
this
lol thereäs nothing english at all about the pl
your land is run by oligarchs
I stopped watching yuro footy because of this. It's just crazy how psg, man city, madrid and barça have a pass to do basically anything they want. Ref decisions are obviously biased "unintendedly" towards the same teams. People are just too moronic to realize it.
I hope everyone slowly stops watching those rigged competitions, so this shithousery ends, but shitskins care too much about teams from countries they'll likely never visit
why is england so suehappy
it is worse than americans
i will now remind the board that we have seen these delusional english nationalist rorkes before
they were desperately claiming that johnson would stay in power and that NO MATTER WHAT no minority would ever be PM
>anglos think they can throw the breaks on selling out to the highest bidder decades after thatcher started the mass rape of their lands
you can't lmfao
He made this up, how dumb do you have to be to believe him.
is it not a crime to lie about having been served legal papers?
Why would it be?
why wouldn't it?
He's apparently showing the legal documents on stream tomorrow so we'll see then
How do you send a cease and desist for something that is public and hasn’t been ruled on yet?