Man City Now threatening to take legal action against anyone who brings up the 115 charges

https://twitter.com/City_Chief/status/1787234241626960037
why is 115 FC so upset?

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    115

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This means they know they've won their case

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The truth of the matter is the FA cannot charge Man City or strip their titles. Doing so would hurt the image of the Premier League and potentially drive advertisers and money away from "the biggest league in the world". Italian football never really recovered from their massive match fixing scandal and so other regulators are terrified that if they come down hard on cheating the same thing could happen to them.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        calm down arsewog, 0 CLs

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          cope trump won

          Not an argument tho

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Imagine if the FA vacated all of Manchester City's honours and awarded them to nobody.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >the FA cannot charge Man City
        The Prem has charged City, not the FA. The charges will be dropped because they are silly

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          People don't know the difference between FFP and Profit and Sustainability rules. Don't bother trying to teach anyone the difference though. Most people are too moronic for that.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        cope trump won

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        In other words, 2008 was the point of no return

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          *1992

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous
          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            it truly was the point of no return

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        City not reporting sponsorship revenue accurately isn't exactly match fixing

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          but it is fraud and if it was a just world all involved would be imprisoned for it but we know rich people don't go to prison

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Its not fraud, the worst it is is breaking the Prem's rules. They haven't done anything illegal.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >false accounting isn't fraud

            OK moron

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            But breaking the rules even according to Arab arselickers such as yourself

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It is because they owe taxes on those wages they paid under the table

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >fraudulent accounting is not fraud

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Nothing has been proven. Reminder the charges involve marginally misreporting sponsorship revenue.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Doing so would hurt the image of the Premier League
        your rigging refBlack folk are doing that already lol

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        the singular good post in the thread i did not actually read until now

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Has 115 bought the rights to the number 115?
      Big if true.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      it's because he keeps correctly pointing out all the dodgy decisions City get and questioning why so many PL refs go to referee games in UAE for huge sums of money

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >"Brent Di Cesare"

    I don't trust anyone who changes their name to fit in or disguise themselves. It's a disgustingly israeli practice.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      He was a copper when he did it though

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Questions for ABCs:
    >why did that portuguse hacker target City?
    >if they're guilty, why couldn't UEFA build a convincing case using the 5 million + documents released?
    >why did UEFA agree the sponsorship deals were fair market value?
    >why would multinational auditors not connected to City commit fraud to protect them?
    >if something was afoot, why wouldn't Mansour just route the funds through Etihad anyway?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Whole reason PL is charging clubs is because they are shit scared of the Independent Football Regulator.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah it seemed like a political move to buy time

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The governing bodies of the game are absolutely petrified of anyone controlling them despite it having been necessary for decades.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >why would multinational auditors not connected to City commit fraud to protect them?
      Auditing is meaningless now, this decade has been scandal after scandal of them doing exactly that.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      you cant use hacked or stolen documents in court moron
      only the US government with parallel construction can get away with this

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Enron has multinational auditors

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Are they going to add charges and continually cry about it like the Scousers?

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    has der spiegel been right about anything ever? absolute shitrag

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >punishes Everton by taking 10 points away from them in the middle of the season
    >punishes Nottingham Forest and pushes them into a relegation battle
    >City on the other hand has been "under investigation" for years now by the Premier League and UEFA.
    The Premier League is so blatantly rigged. They took 10 points away from Everton and then gave them back 4 once it became evident that they weren't gonna get relegated. It's almost like they were trying to create a proper scrap at the bottom of the table. Same reason why Liverpool and Arsenal have been refballed out of points this season.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      City are innocent

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >
      >

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Tbf, fricking everton deserves to die already in 2nd division, they are even worse than wienerroaches
      Also
      >Tp
      >Tf
      >Mutt sports

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Goldbridge speaks as if they are already guilty, they sent him a cease and desist informing him that the charges have not been proven.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >the charges have not been proven.
      That shouldn't stop goldbridge from talking about the charges tho. Or are 115 buying the charges as well?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        He speaks as if they are already guilty

        They are obviously guilty. If they are "proven innocent" that is a result of corruption. This is a completely reasonable opinion to have and obviously protected speech.

        No they aren't. The charges have not been proven. You wanting to believe them doesn't mean they are proven. City are innocent until proven guilty.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >He speaks as if they are already guilty
          Give me one specific instance where he's said with reference to a specific charge that they're guilty of it. Just one.
          >Inb4 they cheated.
          Again, name one specific charge that he's said they're guilty of.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Actually some of the charges have been proven in court once already by UEFA. The fact that the evidence used was time barred from admission led to the withdrawal of the case. There is no such time limit on evidence in the Prem case so those charges will be proven again.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >"I haven't read the judgement"

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They are obviously guilty. If they are "proven innocent" that is a result of corruption. This is a completely reasonable opinion to have and obviously protected speech.

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    riggitini cittini

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    homosexual city

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    115

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    two more weeks, chuds

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Good. Slander is not acceptable.

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    City has 115
    Liverpool have >>97
    What other teams have forbidden numbers?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Brazil 71

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Arsenal have 0

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    These "people" should be living in constant fear of being disappeared.

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    City fans (all 2 of them) report posts on Fhite if they mention the 115 charges btw

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Rules, fraud, regulations, 115 charges etc ect... all irrelevant. The PL is the golden goose and "Manchester City" represent a terminal threat to its global dominance. You allowed an oil backed state masquerading as a football club free reign in the league and this is the result. 6 titles in 7 years and it will be 7 in 8 next season. The PL will be forced to act to protect itself from competitors when "Manchester City" start hitting 10 in a row.
    >But but they can't do that!
    Watch them, it's either see the golden goose die or boot "Manchester City" out of the comp. They don't have a choice

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They can just let Newcastle have free reign too and then you've got a title race, problem solved.

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    There's going to be some legacy tears when they are found not guilty on all charges

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The UK government won't let anything jeopardize their relations with their precious oil sheikh allies

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah, those MoD contracts are the goose's that keep laying golden eggs.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The PL is the UKs biggest cultural export, it brings in billions to the economy every single year through taxes, tourism, investment etc etc.
      Allowing a oil backed state masquerading as a football club to run rough shod over the league will damage the product and thus damage a massive revenue stream. They won't have a choice

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        This has already happened and they haven't done anything.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The Prem has got more profitable since Man City got gud. Plastics like the predictability, it gives them security in their glory hunting choices.

          "Manchester City" is only on 4 in row (or will be in a week or so)
          The PL can delude themselves into thinking this era is just another Man U..... when they're nothing alike. No other PL club can compete with a state, even other state back entities can't because of financial fair play. In 10 years when "Manchester City has won 80% of the trophies available... that's when they'll be forced to act

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            When the new rules come in every club will be able to spend roughly as much as Chelsea/City have spent assembling their current team. Newcastle will be fine.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The Prem has got more profitable since Man City got gud. Plastics like the predictability, it gives them security in their glory hunting choices.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >The Prem has got more profitable since Man City got gud

          >When this is taken into account, there is in fact a decrease in the per game value of the rights under the new deal (approx. £6.2m per game) when compared with the value under both the existing deal (approx. £8.11m per game) and the 2016/17 – 2018/19 deal (approx. £10.19m per game).

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      this

      The PL is the UKs biggest cultural export, it brings in billions to the economy every single year through taxes, tourism, investment etc etc.
      Allowing a oil backed state masquerading as a football club to run rough shod over the league will damage the product and thus damage a massive revenue stream. They won't have a choice

      lol thereäs nothing english at all about the pl
      your land is run by oligarchs

  20. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I stopped watching yuro footy because of this. It's just crazy how psg, man city, madrid and barça have a pass to do basically anything they want. Ref decisions are obviously biased "unintendedly" towards the same teams. People are just too moronic to realize it.
    I hope everyone slowly stops watching those rigged competitions, so this shithousery ends, but shitskins care too much about teams from countries they'll likely never visit

  21. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    why is england so suehappy
    it is worse than americans

  22. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i will now remind the board that we have seen these delusional english nationalist rorkes before

    they were desperately claiming that johnson would stay in power and that NO MATTER WHAT no minority would ever be PM

  23. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >anglos think they can throw the breaks on selling out to the highest bidder decades after thatcher started the mass rape of their lands
    you can't lmfao

  24. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    He made this up, how dumb do you have to be to believe him.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      is it not a crime to lie about having been served legal papers?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Why would it be?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          why wouldn't it?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      He's apparently showing the legal documents on stream tomorrow so we'll see then

  25. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    How do you send a cease and desist for something that is public and hasn’t been ruled on yet?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *