>The first World Cup was the only one without qualification. Every country affiliated with FIFA was invited to compete and given a deadline of 28 February 1930 to accept. The number of 16 teams was not reached so there were no qualifications. Plenty of interest was shown by nations in the Americas; Argentina, Brazil, Bolivia, Chile, Mexico, Paraguay, Peru and the United States all entered. A total of seven South American teams participated, more than in any subsequent World Cup Finals. However, because of the long, costly trip by ship across the Atlantic Ocean and the length of absence required for players,[6] very few European teams were inclined to take part. Some refused to countenance travel to South America in any circumstances
>franchises
Its called a Nation you idiot.
anyhow, its because Ur-gay is fricking stupid.
Surely you don't believe your nation had to do anything with it? The people, the government? You cannot be that naive right? I'll give you the real answer. It's just a glorified club with a logo slapped on which so happens to be your countrys flag. It's a franchise.
Uhhh no Black person if its was like your heckin' franchises then they wouldn't tie all the time and have the same nations consistently win, which doesn't sound very franchise-ey to me.
It's a real sport, run by our national teams raised on our soils. Honestly what are you even trying to say?
Where's Uruguay?
First world cup was hardly a world cup, it was an americas cup with a couple of random invited countries
>The first World Cup was the only one without qualification. Every country affiliated with FIFA was invited to compete and given a deadline of 28 February 1930 to accept. The number of 16 teams was not reached so there were no qualifications. Plenty of interest was shown by nations in the Americas; Argentina, Brazil, Bolivia, Chile, Mexico, Paraguay, Peru and the United States all entered. A total of seven South American teams participated, more than in any subsequent World Cup Finals. However, because of the long, costly trip by ship across the Atlantic Ocean and the length of absence required for players,[6] very few European teams were inclined to take part. Some refused to countenance travel to South America in any circumstances
You are nobody to say if the 30 cup was valid
Uruguay is such a fricking fraud
>long, costly trip by ship
we already had planes by then, wtf are these moron's problems
not commercial planes as we know today
yes, we had them by 1930. maybe not in your gay favelas but the US did
We invented the plane.
This is europe we are talking about, they are always about 20 years behind the US
Cope. It is recognized and uruguay was the best team in the world
yeah, unlike the 34-58 cups right? lmao
1934 onwards europe actually starts playing in them, yes, they are actual world cups at least.
Only 1938 I would call pretty shitty since its the opposite and was mostly a euro
So ours doesnt count but those held by dictatorial italy and during wars are?
Cope moron
thats moronic it counts.
Why does it start in 1934?
shut up stop asking questions you're ruining my epic thread
You must be 18 years or older to post on Fhite
europeans watch the same club win for decades and still enjoy it. to them this is anyones game
Something very pleasant about Germany's badge.
Circle
>a fricking chicken
Now show NBA winners
Why France badge is a chicken?
And the host country is always refballed into the finals
the ecuador was realistically more like 4-0
woah...same 5 nations....nice "sport" you got there
>Have a national competition of only american teams
>Call it world series
You're the one to talk
Only 6 countries won the Basket WC, 5 the vollleyball WC, 9 the baseball World cup and four the Rugby world cup
The winner will be one of those
Spain
France
Germany
Argentina
Pindorama
There is no 6th alternative.
>only team to win one each line
you know what that means
O HEXA
Also Germany
I find it very embarrassing that England, the founder country of football, has only one WC
I'm welsh but janny messed up my flag btw
its because of an anti-english bias which has been clouding football for a century now. the refs have always hated us. this is the truth.
Why do all the franchises except the 1950 winner have a star for each win?
>franchises
american moment
Surely you don't believe your nation had to do anything with it? The people, the government? You cannot be that naive right? I'll give you the real answer. It's just a glorified club with a logo slapped on which so happens to be your countrys flag. It's a franchise.
Its literally tax found
Uhhh no Black person if its was like your heckin' franchises then they wouldn't tie all the time and have the same nations consistently win, which doesn't sound very franchise-ey to me.
It's a real sport, run by our national teams raised on our soils. Honestly what are you even trying to say?
>franchises
Its called a Nation you idiot.
anyhow, its because Ur-gay is fricking stupid.
american doesnt know what a country is. not surprised if you grew up in a israeli corporation that calls itself the usa.
Funny how one team appear 5 times in there and it will appear a 6th time soon
>Counting any title in football won before 2000
>Italy
>Brazil
Only two teams have back-to-backed world cups. I feel like France might repeat this year
meanwhile in the most kino tournament...
yeah I'll have a large shish a cheesy chips and a can of coke pls stavros
only 79 countries have take in a World Cup tournament
>5 different winners in 16 years
it's fine
Others just need to git gud
if england did it anyone can
rate our logo
Looks more like a basketball federation logo instead of football
I like the wings. (Should have had a rising sun though)
Check your World Cup privilege
there’s room for a 3-starred team up there
What went wrong with brasil 66?
Czechia or Austria would have won 1934. Mussoloni rigged the whole cup for Italy.
I smells an o hexa