The England squad value is holy inflated because they are pl players, without R. James Ben and also Maddison, Philipps and Kyle Walker injured, France is by far the most depth squad
1 year ago
Anonymous
it's not because our players are in big clubs that they're the best, we have way too many rookies, the only the attack look okay, but only on paper because they always struggle to score goals
1 year ago
Anonymous
did you that that midfield? did you that that defense?
1 year ago
Anonymous
all of those guys are healthy. walker is 1-2 weeks away from being healthy, and he can unrust in the group stage.
phillips, maddison, and ben white all fully healthy
reece james is not even in the squad
england and france have always had the best and deepest squads
france because they can choose from all of africa and PL because of academy redevelopment in the 2010s so all the top 6 have a couple of good english talents (foden, saka, mount, rice, trent, rashford etc)
We are nor nr 1? We got the best players in the world for every position. This is bullshit how can the colonials have better shot? How can the dutch even be on the same tier?
Yes of course. They are fun to watch and in the last few wcs they've been able to make european teams shit their pants. They almost kicked Belgium out in the round of 16 last wc.
That's great. I hope they do good. (half Japanese)
Btw I want to root for Mexico on the side. I don't know WC history but everyone is always shitposting about them so I'd love to see them BTFO a really good team for the memes.
Mexico is based imo.
I always cheer for the Asian and African teams since nobody expects them to do shit. They are sovl. Last World Cup Japan actually did pretty well and beat Germany, the previous WC champion.
Mexico is not worth cheering for.
1 year ago
Anonymous
I am going to watch that match, Japan vs Germany. >Mexico is not worth cheering for
This is why I will cheer for them. I already like Mexico but the bants will be great if they do something.
1 year ago
Anonymous
I always cheer for the Asian and African teams since nobody expects them to do shit. They are sovl. Last World Cup Japan actually did pretty well and beat Germany, the previous WC champion.
Mexico is not worth cheering for.
Are you sure it was Japan? I'm looking it up and I think it was South Korea but I know nothing about football.
1 year ago
Anonymous
yeah he’s wrong it was south korea fren
1 year ago
Anonymous
Kamada is my favorite so far.
Yeah he posted almost exactly at the same time after I noticed lol.
1 year ago
Anonymous
my memory is shit
it was Korea that beat Germany, not Japan
They should merge the need a miracle and no real chances tiers. Not only do those mean the same, but all those teams are pretty much filler.
Maybe just swap Serbia and Senegal.
?t=96
What's going on here? Why is there no goalie?
My guess is because they were down with not enough time, the goalie played offense for a miracle? I didn't know the goalie could even leave.
Basically yeah it was minute 90+ so its 1:0 or 2:0 doesn't matter if they don't score, teams do that when they are down a goal just send everyone forward especially if there's a corner shot in in the 90+ minute mark, then you have 11 players in front of your goal waiting for a miracle.
yes, because they couldve finished the group with 6 points in case of a win
and yes, the goalie can leave, it happens often in make it or break it minutes
Okay thanks I'm seeing something similar here.
So when there is a tie break, it goes to teams who scored more points in the group? Or with the best point differential of scores and scored on?
first you look at the games the tied teams had
for example, germany and spain both have 6 points, but if spain won the germany v spain game, then spain goes through
if they tied, then you look at goal difference, if not that, then cards
a) greatest number of points obtained in all group matches;
b) goal difference in all group matches;
c) greatest number of goals scored in all group matches.
If two or more teams are equal on the basis of the above three criteria, their
rankings shall be determined as follows:
d) greatest number of points obtained in the group matches between the
teams concerned;
e) goal difference resulting from the group matches between the teams
concerned;
f) greater number of goals scored in all group matches between the teams
concerned;
g) the goals scored away from home count double between the teams
concerned (if the tie is only between two teams);
h) fair play points system in which the number of yellow and red cards in all
group matches is considered
i) drawing of lots by the FIFA Organising Committee.
yes, because they couldve finished the group with 6 points in case of a win
and yes, the goalie can leave, it happens often in make it or break it minutes
Why is Belgium so overrated? Even FIFA thinks they're better than they really are with them always being in the top 1-3 since like 2016. They're fricking frauds
Why is everyone overrating us so much? We're very shit.
We're not better than, for example, Iran or Ecuador.
Suárez and Cavani are already old and finished, they are not going to save us.
there should be a tier right above underdogs (the dogs tier) for portugal, belgium and croatia
>right above underdogs
>the dogs tier
>should be a tier right above underdogs (the dogs tier)
kek based
list of best posters on Fhite
1. England
2. Portugal
3. Brazil
simple as
You mean worst posters right
Of course
no, best
do NOT impersonate me again
>(the dogs tier)
Argentina and Brazil will choke hard.
We have too many injuries
You still have the best squad in the world
no we don't. england actually does.
The England squad value is holy inflated because they are pl players, without R. James Ben and also Maddison, Philipps and Kyle Walker injured, France is by far the most depth squad
it's not because our players are in big clubs that they're the best, we have way too many rookies, the only the attack look okay, but only on paper because they always struggle to score goals
did you that that midfield? did you that that defense?
all of those guys are healthy. walker is 1-2 weeks away from being healthy, and he can unrust in the group stage.
phillips, maddison, and ben white all fully healthy
reece james is not even in the squad
england and france have always had the best and deepest squads
france because they can choose from all of africa and PL because of academy redevelopment in the 2010s so all the top 6 have a couple of good english talents (foden, saka, mount, rice, trent, rashford etc)
Denmark and Switzerland are the same level
NOT SO FAST, SOUTH AMERICANS AND AFRICANS (france)
>serbia
>needs a miracle
that's rude
No. Argentina is contenders. South Korea and Canada in Need a miracle. Uruguay too.
We are nor nr 1? We got the best players in the world for every position. This is bullshit how can the colonials have better shot? How can the dutch even be on the same tier?
Ronaldo is mentally ill.
I know, he shouldn't have a place on our glorious selection.
You shoulda go 100 on Greatugal
If it calms you down, I have 50€ on Poortugal and 50€ on Argentina to win it all.
Cancelo and Ruben Dias are frauds.
>two white countries and one african country in the top tier
i''m ok with this.
>England are contenders
If I root for Japan do you guys think I will have a fun time?
(My first world cup)
Yes of course. They are fun to watch and in the last few wcs they've been able to make european teams shit their pants. They almost kicked Belgium out in the round of 16 last wc.
That's great. I hope they do good. (half Japanese)
Btw I want to root for Mexico on the side. I don't know WC history but everyone is always shitposting about them so I'd love to see them BTFO a really good team for the memes.
Mexico is based imo.
I always cheer for the Asian and African teams since nobody expects them to do shit. They are sovl. Last World Cup Japan actually did pretty well and beat Germany, the previous WC champion.
Mexico is not worth cheering for.
I am going to watch that match, Japan vs Germany.
>Mexico is not worth cheering for
This is why I will cheer for them. I already like Mexico but the bants will be great if they do something.
Are you sure it was Japan? I'm looking it up and I think it was South Korea but I know nothing about football.
yeah he’s wrong it was south korea fren
Kamada is my favorite so far.
Yeah he posted almost exactly at the same time after I noticed lol.
my memory is shit
it was Korea that beat Germany, not Japan
It's okay.
They should merge the need a miracle and no real chances tiers. Not only do those mean the same, but all those teams are pretty much filler.
Maybe just swap Serbia and Senegal.
if God forbid we get eliminated I'll root for Mexico
Time for the Miracle in the Desert.
Our squad is way worse than 2014
?t=96
What's going on here? Why is there no goalie?
My guess is because they were down with not enough time, the goalie played offense for a miracle? I didn't know the goalie could even leave.
Basically yeah it was minute 90+ so its 1:0 or 2:0 doesn't matter if they don't score, teams do that when they are down a goal just send everyone forward especially if there's a corner shot in in the 90+ minute mark, then you have 11 players in front of your goal waiting for a miracle.
Okay thanks I'm seeing something similar here.
So when there is a tie break, it goes to teams who scored more points in the group? Or with the best point differential of scores and scored on?
first you look at the games the tied teams had
for example, germany and spain both have 6 points, but if spain won the germany v spain game, then spain goes through
if they tied, then you look at goal difference, if not that, then cards
Okay, thank you for explaining.
Official rules :
a) greatest number of points obtained in all group matches;
b) goal difference in all group matches;
c) greatest number of goals scored in all group matches.
If two or more teams are equal on the basis of the above three criteria, their
rankings shall be determined as follows:
d) greatest number of points obtained in the group matches between the
teams concerned;
e) goal difference resulting from the group matches between the teams
concerned;
f) greater number of goals scored in all group matches between the teams
concerned;
g) the goals scored away from home count double between the teams
concerned (if the tie is only between two teams);
h) fair play points system in which the number of yellow and red cards in all
group matches is considered
i) drawing of lots by the FIFA Organising Committee.
Thank you bro.
yes, because they couldve finished the group with 6 points in case of a win
and yes, the goalie can leave, it happens often in make it or break it minutes
the sum is not equal to its parts
Why isn’t Tunisia in the lowest tier
>France as favourites
they are the most overrated team right now there gonna get eliminated in the group stage and the world cup curse will still live on
Why in the frick is Ecuador on the bottom but Uruguay on the mid?
how is Senegal an underdog but Serbia needs and Switzerland need a miracle?
Why is Belgium so overrated? Even FIFA thinks they're better than they really are with them always being in the top 1-3 since like 2016. They're fricking frauds
Portugal is not a contender. It's laughable they are there. Senegal is not an underdog. That's even more laughable actually.
argentina should be in a class of its own. i dont think there has ever been a greater power gap in a world cup
Why is everyone overrating us so much? We're very shit.
We're not better than, for example, Iran or Ecuador.
Suárez and Cavani are already old and finished, they are not going to save us.
In world cups people simple cant underrate wolrd cup winners